What is a tender response?
A tender response (also called a bid, an offer or a submission) is your written offer to supply what a buyer has asked for, on the buyer’s terms. In government work it answers a formal request: a request for tender (RFT), a request for quote (RFQ), a request for proposal (RFP) or, at an earlier stage, an expression of interest (EOI).
The buyer tells you in advance exactly how responses will be judged: which requirements are pass or fail, which criteria are scored, how much each one is worth and how long each answer may be. An evaluation panel then reads every response against those same rules. Under the Commonwealth Procurement Rules, and the state rules that mirror them, the buyer must choose the offer that is the best value for money, which is not always the lowest price.
That is why tender writing is closer to a compliance exercise than to marketing. A response that misses a mandatory item can be excluded unread, and a well-written answer that ignores part of a criterion simply loses those marks.
What’s in a tender pack
Government tenders rarely arrive as one document. Read every file in the pack before you write, because the questions are usually in one document and the rules for answering them in another.
| Document | What it tells you | What to do with it |
|---|---|---|
| Conditions of tender | The rules: closing date and time, how to lodge, the contact officer, how responses are evaluated. | Build your timeline and compliance checklist from it. |
| Statement of requirements | What the buyer wants delivered (also called the specification or scope of work). | Match each requirement to work you have already done. |
| Response schedules | The questions you must answer, often with word or page limits. Also called returnable schedules. | Answer in this exact document and format. |
| Pricing schedule | How your price must be set out. | Complete every line without changing the format. |
| Draft contract | The terms you will be held to if you win. | Note anything you can’t accept and raise it the way the tender asks. |
| Addenda | Changes and answers to questions issued while the tender is open. | Read every one. They can change requirements or the closing date. |
If the tender refers to a document you don’t have, such as a schedule mentioned in the conditions but missing from your download, ask the contact officer for it early.
1. Decide whether to bid
A good bid takes days of work, so decide early whether this one is worth it. Start with the mandatory requirements, sometimes called conditions of participation: insurances at a set level, licences, accreditations, registrations. These are pass or fail. If you can’t meet one by the closing date, stop there.
Then weigh the fit honestly. Have you delivered work of a similar size and type? Can you show it with real projects and referees? Can you resource the contract if you win? A tender you are a strong match for is a better use of a weekend than three you are a weak match for.
2. Build a compliance checklist
Before writing anything, turn the tender into a list of everything you must provide. This list is what you check the finished bid against.
- Step 1: Every mandatory requirement, with the exact condition and the proof it asks for.
- Step 2: Every selection criterion, with its weighting and word or page limit.
- Step 3: Every attachment, declaration and form to return, signed where required.
- Step 4: The format rules: file types, page size, fonts, naming, whether a cover letter is allowed.
- Step 5: The closing date and time, the time zone and the lodgement method.
3. Plan backwards from the closing time
Work back from the closing time, not forward from today. Leave the last day for review and lodgement alone, and set your own deadline for a finished draft before that.
Note the deadline for questions. Most tenders name one contact officer and stop taking questions some days before closing. Answers are usually sent to every bidder as an addendum without saying who asked, so asking costs you nothing. Ask early, and ask about anything that changes how you would answer.
4. Gather your evidence before you write
Panels score proof, not adjectives. Collect the facts each criterion will need before you draft, so you write from evidence rather than searching for it mid-sentence.
- Past projects: client, location, dates, scale, contract value and measurable results.
- Certificates and accreditations, with numbers and expiry dates (ISO, industry, licences).
- Insurances, with insurer, policy number, amount and the date the cover runs to.
- Key staff: roles, qualifications and relevant experience.
- Referees who have agreed to be contacted, with current details.
- Policies and systems the tender asks about: WHS, quality, environmental, privacy.
Keep this evidence in one place and keep it current. Most of it is reused on every tender, and an expired certificate or insurance quoted as current is exactly the kind of claim a panel checks.
If you don’t have evidence for something a criterion asks, say what you do have or how you would meet it. Don’t invent experience, numbers or accreditations. An over-claim found during evaluation or reference checks can cost you the contract.
5. Answer each criterion
Answer in the response schedule the buyer provides, in the order they ask, under their headings. If a criterion has several parts, use its own words as subheadings so the panel can find each part. Then use the same structure for every answer:
- Step 1: Open with a direct answer to the question in one or two sentences.
- Step 2: Give the evidence: your most relevant projects, with client, scale, dates and contract value.
- Step 3: Explain how you did the work, in the terms the criterion uses.
- Step 4: Show the result with numbers you can prove.
- Step 5: Link it back to what this buyer needs.
For experience questions, the STAR method (situation, task, action, result) is a useful way to make sure each example is complete. Our guide to responding to selection criteria covers it with examples.
Write in plain, specific Australian English. Every sentence should carry a fact the panel can score. Aim for around 90% of the word limit and never go over it.
Worked example: a weaker and a stronger answer
Here is one criterion from a sample request for quote for commercial cleaning, answered two ways. The tender and the supplier, Coastal Commercial Cleaning, are made up. The stronger answer uses only facts from that supplier’s own evidence.
Describe your experience delivering commercial cleaning services to comparable government or commercial sites in the last three years. Include the scale of sites, contract value and outcomes achieved.
Coastal Commercial Cleaning is a leading provider of high-quality cleaning services with extensive experience across a wide range of sectors. Our dedicated team is committed to excellence and customer satisfaction, and we pride ourselves on going above and beyond for every client.
We have worked with many government and commercial clients over the years and always deliver outstanding results.
Why
- The criterion asks for three things, the scale of sites, contract value and outcomes, and none of them is answered.
- No client, site, date or number the panel could check.
- “Leading”, “committed to excellence” and “outstanding results” are claims, not evidence. A panel can’t score them.
We have cleaned occupied government sites in NSW continuously since 2019, and currently service 18 Department of Education offices on a daily contract.
NSW Department of Education, 18 regional offices (2021 to now, $480,000 a year). Daily cleaning of occupied offices. We introduced a fixed site supervisor and digital issue logging, which reduced cleaning-related complaints by 40% in the first year. Monthly quality audits have averaged 96%. Referee: David Nguyen, Facilities Manager.
Central Coast Local Health District, 9 community health clinics (2019 to 2024, $310,000 a year). Infection-control cleaning to National Safety and Quality Health Service standards, with zero critical audit findings in five years.
Both contracts match the scale and setting of this one: several occupied government sites, cleaned daily to an audited standard.
Why
- Opens with a direct answer, then gives each part the criterion asks for: scale (18 offices, 9 clinics), contract value and outcomes.
- Every fact can be checked: named clients, dates, values, audit results and a referee.
- Closes by linking the evidence to this buyer’s sites, so the panel doesn’t have to make the connection.
BidShortlist drafts every criterion this way, from your own evidence, and marks the gaps instead of filling them. Your first bid is free.
Start your free bidHow evaluation panels score your response
Each panel member scores each criterion against a rating scale, and the scores are combined using the weightings. Every tender sets its own scale, so use the one in your documents. A common shape looks like this:
| Score | Rating | What the panel usually sees |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Not addressed | No answer, or an answer that doesn’t respond to the criterion. |
| 1 to 3 | Poor | General statements, little or no evidence, parts of the criterion missed. |
| 4 to 6 | Acceptable | Addresses the criterion with some evidence, but with gaps or generic content. |
| 7 to 8 | Good | Addresses every part with specific, relevant evidence. |
| 9 to 10 | Excellent | Every part answered with strong, verifiable evidence and a clear benefit to the buyer. |
Weightings decide where your effort pays off. With the sample tender’s weightings, lifting the 40% criterion from 6 to 8 adds 0.8 to the weighted total, while the same two-point lift on the 10% criterion adds only 0.2. Write the heavily weighted answers first and give them your best evidence.
Panels also check what you say. Referees may be called, certificates and insurances checked, and claims compared across sections. An answer that contradicts another part of your bid, or promises more than you can deliver, costs marks or creates risk if you win.
6. Price it and complete the schedules
Fill in the pricing schedule exactly as set out: every line, the units asked for, GST shown the way the tender specifies. Don’t add conditions or change the format unless the tender allows it. If the work you described in your answers has a cost, make sure the price covers it, because a methodology the price can’t pay for is a risk the panel will notice.
Complete every returnable form and declaration: conflicts of interest, compliance with the draft contract, insurances, referees. Only declare what is true. Declarations are legal statements.
7. Review the whole response the way a panel would
Once every answer is drafted, read the bid from start to finish as one document. Better still, ask someone who didn’t write it to read it with the criteria beside them.
- Does every answer address every part of its criterion?
- Can every claim be backed by evidence you could send tomorrow?
- Do the sections agree with each other on numbers, staff, dates and methods?
- Is anything repeated so often that it crowds out new evidence?
- Have you promised anything you couldn’t deliver at the price you quoted?
8. Lodge early
Lodge through the method the tender specifies: AusTender for federal work, or the state or agency portal, such as buy.nsw, Buying for Victoria or QTenders. Upload well before the closing time. Portals slow down near the deadline and large files take time.
Late responses are generally excluded. Under the Commonwealth Procurement Rules a late submission can only be accepted if the lateness was the agency’s fault, and state rules are similarly strict. Keep the lodgement receipt.
Tender response checklist
Run through this before you lodge.
- Every mandatory requirement met, with the proof attached
- Every selection criterion answered, in the order and format asked
- Every part of every criterion addressed
- Every answer inside its word or page limit
- Every claim backed by evidence you can produce
- Certificates and insurances current on the closing date
- Pricing schedule complete, in the required format
- All returnable schedules, forms and declarations completed and signed
- Every addendum read and acted on
- File names, formats and sizes as the tender requires
- Referees told they may be contacted
- Lodged through the right portal before the closing time, with the receipt saved
Common reasons tender responses lose marks
Most lost marks come from the same handful of mistakes, and nearly all of them can be caught with a checklist and one careful read.
- A mandatory requirement missed, so the bid is excluded before scoring.
- Part of a criterion not answered, especially the second or third part of a long question.
- Generic company copy pasted into every answer instead of evidence for that criterion.
- Claims with no proof: “industry-leading”, “extensive experience”, “best value”.
- Answers over the word limit, where the extra text may not be read.
- The buyer’s format ignored: answers moved out of the response schedule, or sections reordered.
- Expired certificates or insurance presented as current.
- A price that doesn’t match the methodology described.
- Lodged late, or lodged to the wrong place.
Common questions
What is the difference between an RFT, RFQ, RFP and EOI?
They are all ways a buyer asks the market for offers. A request for tender (RFT) is the formal, usually larger process with detailed criteria. A request for quote (RFQ) is typically shorter, for lower-value or well-defined work. A request for proposal (RFP) invites suppliers to propose how they would meet a need. An expression of interest (EOI) is often a first stage that shortlists suppliers for a later RFT. The way you write the response is the same: answer exactly what is asked, with evidence.
How long should a tender response be?
As long as each criterion allows and no longer. Treat every word or page limit as a hard maximum and aim for about 90% of it. Text over the limit may not be read or may be penalised. If there is no limit, answer every part fully and stop.
Is there a tender response template I can use?
Use the buyer’s own response schedule wherever one is provided, because answers moved into your own template can be hard for the panel to score. Inside each answer, the structure in this guide works for most criteria: a direct answer, your evidence, how you did it, the result, and the link to this buyer’s needs.
What is the most common reason tenders are rejected?
Non-compliance rather than poor writing: a mandatory requirement not met, a criterion left unanswered, a limit exceeded, a form not returned or a late lodgement. A compliance checklist built from the tender documents catches most of these.
Can I ask the buyer questions during a tender?
Yes, through the contact officer named in the tender and before the deadline for questions. Answers are usually shared with every bidder as an addendum, without saying who asked. Don’t contact anyone else at the agency about the tender while it is open.
Do I need a capability statement?
Only if the tender asks for one. It is still worth having: a capability statement collects your experience, certifications and key projects in one place, which makes every tender response faster to write and more consistent.
Can AI write my tender response?
AI can do much of the work: reading the tender pack, listing every requirement, drafting each answer and checking it, provided every answer is built from your real evidence and you review it before lodging. BidShortlist drafts every criterion from your own evidence, marks what only you can answer instead of inventing it, and reviews each answer the way an evaluation panel would. You check it and lodge it yourself.